minds, metaphors and (ethical) manipulation
Posts tagged ideas
Influence: actions speak louder than words
Apr 4th
Influential language is important. Questions, listening and metaphor are important. But there could be an even more important factor in influence: the purely “incidental” behaviour of the people around you.
“Turns out your colleague’s husband’s sister can make you fat, even if you’ve never met. And a happy friend affects your happiness more than a bigger income. It turns out our connections – our friends, our friend’s friends, even our friends’ friends’ friends – have an astonishing influence on our behaviours, beliefs and even health.”
That’s the blurb from Connected by Nicholas Christakis and James Fowler, which sets out the science behind these surprising claims.
As I blogged recently, the infectious metaphors in people’s language, including their body language, provide one of the important ways in which behaviours spread through groups.
And there’s more to it than that.
Because behaviours can spread through networks of people even when there’s no intentional communication – and even no direct relationship – between the people involved.
Actions speak louder than words – and significantly louder than the small gestures which are generally thought of as “body language”.
Here’s an example. I live very close to the Brentford football ground and yesterday, the team was playing at Wembley.
At one level, Wembley is a More >
Is passive income damaging your health?
Mar 21st
Could the myth of “passive income” be damaging your health – or at least your psychological well-being – as Daniel Priestley, author of Become a Key Person of Influence, proposed in a talk recently?
He argued that the notion of “passive income” was founded on the idea of making money by doing something one didn’t want to actually do, when in reality, money is more often made by doing what you’re truly passionate about.
It was interesting to hear this the day after experiencing TEDx Observer, a day of truly passionate speakers with “ideas worth sharing”. Speakers who were intent on changing the world for the better, each in a different, specific way: charity workers, bloggers, academics, entrepreneurs, artists, people with “causes”. Speakers who were not necessarily doing what they love so much as doing what they felt was important. More on this another day.
But Dan’s point was also interesting in the context of James Geary’s new book about the role of metaphor in thought, I is an Other.
Among many other interesting ideas, James draws attention to the metaphors we use for money markets. He says: “Psychologist Michael W Morris and collaborators studied a slew of financial commentaries and identified two primary market metaphors.
“What More >
What kind of editor are you?
Feb 2nd
Posted by Judy in Clean Language
Hypnotic storyteller Robin Manuell (http://www.ideasinmotion.co.uk) has a great take on the famous Disney Strategy for creativity.
For him, the three ‘positions’ in the sequence are Imagineer, Realiser and Editor, rather than Dreamer, Realist and Critic (or “Spoiler”).
Similar, I know, but definitely different. And the subtle differences between the words make a big difference when it comes to using the strategy in the real world.
Whoever wants to be a ‘critic’, particularly of things connected with their own big dreams? Or worse still, a ‘spoiler’?
An expert ‘editor’ on the other hand, can’t help add value.
She’ll be bringing in her knowledge of the marketplace, of what really sells, and of how other people have done this kind of thing successfully.
She’ll be tweaking the language to bring out the best and most powerful points, while correcting the dodgier grammar and spelling.
She’ll be asking great questions.
She’ll be making your great work really sing.
That’s how it seems to me, at any rate. How does it work for you?
How new words are born
Jan 25th
Posted by Judy in Clean Language
New words are being created at an astonishing rate at the moment – or so it seems from here.
In the last week, I’ve spotted three interesting ones in my inbox:
- Andrew Cain introduced Fixititis. He says it happens when patients expect the doctor to fix everything for them – and the caring doctor feels overly responsible for things they can’t control
- Jamie Smart introduced another “condition” - Tacticitis. It’s a craving for magical, quick-fix remedies that will solve all our problems & give us what we want NOW!
- And on the plus side, Joe Vitale offers Benestrophe: many good things happening at once; the opposite of a catastrophe.
In each of these new words, the author has made effective use of metaphor: they are comparing one kind of thing to another kind of thing. So in the first two examples, the use of “…itis” compares a common psychological state to a medical condition, and therefore pathologises it.
Another feature of all three new words is that they combine ideas in new ways, in order to create new meanings. Had you previously thought of the possibility that good things might come in waves, even tsunamis?
These are great examples of a process described in Steven Pinker’s brilliant book, The More >
The listener’s expression matters
Aug 26th
Recent research has confirmed what great listeners have always known – the way the a listener behaves makes a huge difference to the quality of information they receive from the speaker.
The British Psychological Society reports on a study which demonstrated this experimentally. A group of students watch a short film and then described it to a listener. Half the listeners had a ‘positive’ attitude – smiling, nodding and maintaining an open body position – while the others frowned and didn’t smile.
Speakers reporting to a positive listener used more abstractions, describing aspects of the film that couldn’t be seen, such as a character’s thoughts and emotions, and also included more of their own opinions. The kind of information, in fact, that brings any piece of research to life!
“Consider what this means,” researcher Camiel Beukeboom said. “By merely smiling or frowning a listener could influence how a speaker reports information and how it is subsequently remembered, and possibly passed on. In, for instance, witness interrogations, job interviews, politics, or psychotherapy, a simple smile or frown could potentially have a large impact.”
- Beukeboom, C. (2009). ‘When words feel right: How affective expressions of listeners change a speaker’s language use.’ European Journal of Social Psychology, 39 (5), 747-756 More >









