minds, metaphors and (ethical) manipulation
Sacking The “Berlusconi Of The Brain”
Berlusconi no longer runs Italy. But is the “Berlusconi of the Brain” still in charge in your own world?
According to Iain McGilchrist, the left hemisphere of the brain is like Berlusconi because it controls the media. It airbrushes reality, creating rational, linguistic arguments to generate an illusory perfect, mechanistic world.
When you combine that idea with the fact that the left brain is more interested in what it already knows than in new things, the result is a hall of mirrors, in which the left brain knows more and more about what it already knows, and is less and less open to new ideas – and to grubby, imperfect reality.
McGilchrist is interested in the effect of that at the level of society and culture. He argues that society is becoming more and more “left-brained” – technocratic, bureaucratic, mechanistic.
He quotes Einstein, who said: “The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.”
I’m curious about how all this affects us as individuals. Is it possible for a person to get “stuck” in the world of the left brain? I suspect it is possible – and the fact you’re reading this means that you’re vulnerable.
If you’re the kind of person who reads and reads about how minds work, about how people think, about the structure of communication and human relationships, you’re showing an affinity for the left brain’s view of the world.
The bind is that the world of the left brain is safe and predictable. Those books and websites aren’t going to stab me or rape me. They create a comfort zone where you can relax.
But perhaps they can be damaging, too. They create an idealised notion of how people “should” be: you too can be rich, attractive, talented, famous… if you follow these clever techniques and hand over lots of cash.
And inherent in that notion is the idea that perhaps you’re not yet “good enough” to engage with real people… so you stay in your nice, safe, bookish, nerdy comfort zone of the rational mind.
There is another way to find out about people and the way they think: to get out there and engage with them. But that’s unpredictable, and therefore risky. It requires us to engage the right hemisphere – so we may have to operate without a clear structure or plan, even without language, and to pay attention in a more holistic way. We’ll be way out of our comfort zones very quickly… and then what could happen?
Given the choice, would you sack your own Berlusconi?
Or would you stick with the man who famously said: ”The left has no taste, even when it comes to women”?
| Print article | This entry was posted by Judy on 15/11/2011 at 1:29 pm, and is filed under Body-Mind, Metaphor, The Mind. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
No trackbacks yet.
Do You Know The Right Answer?
about 6 months ago - 1 comment
How often do you ask a question to which you don’t know the answer? “Never!” is apparently the answer trial lawyers would give. Makes sense – they dont want a witness embarrassing them on the stand with something unexpected. But the rule seems to spread beyond the courtroom. At the Clean Business Exchange on Friday,
How People Think About Numbers
about 6 months ago - 6 comments
Here’s an interesting insight into how people think: most people (at least in the West) mentally represent smaller numbers to their left and larger numbers to their right. And here’s something even more interesting: leaning to the left, even imperceptibly, can influence how you estimate numbers. Details of the research are here. It’s the latest
It’s All About You And Me
about 6 months ago - 1 comment
Here’s something I bet you never realised. Apparently, the pronouns you use can reveal your personality. Not only that, but your use of pronouns changes depending on how stressed you are, or where you’re sitting in the hierarchy of your social group – among other factors. That’s the amazing claim by James Pennebaker in his
Breakthrough Sessions
about 7 months ago - 2 comments
If you were to have a “breakthrough session”, what kind of “breakthrough” would yours be? My friend James Tripp and I were talking yesterday about how various coaches and therapists offer “breakthrough sessions” – and I must have subconsciously asked myself: “What kind of breakthrough?” because a personal story sprang to mind. (James pointed out
The Perfect Elevator Pitch?
about 11 months ago - 8 comments
How much can a label such as “coach” or “mentor” say about you? My recent blog Call Yourself A Coach? promoted some interesting discussions, online and off. The consensus? Of course a label can’t say everything about you – because there’s more to you than the label. But my point was that labels aren’t just
Are Second-Hand Metaphors Restricting Your Life?
about 1 year ago - 4 comments
Are you living your life according to your own metaphors? Or is your system being restricted by ill-fitting second-hand ideas, images and connections? As I’ve mentioned frequently in this blog, the metaphors you use in your thinking (including your subconscious processing) have a profound impact on your behaviour. It’s inevitable, because metaphor is the language
Influence: actions speak louder than words
about 1 year ago - 2 comments
Influential language is important. Questions, listening and metaphor are important. But there could be an even more important factor in influence: the purely “incidental” behaviour of the people around you. “Turns out your colleague’s husband’s sister can make you fat, even if you’ve never met. And a happy friend affects your happiness more than a
Is passive income damaging your health?
about 1 year ago - 12 comments
Could the myth of “passive income” be damaging your health – or at least your psychological well-being – as Daniel Priestley, author of Become a Key Person of Influence, proposed in a talk recently? He argued that the notion of “passive income” was founded on the idea of making money by doing something one didn’t
What kind of editor are you?
about 1 year ago - 2 comments
Hypnotic storyteller Robin Manuell (http://www.ideasinmotion.co.uk) has a great take on the famous Disney Strategy for creativity. For him, the three ‘positions’ in the sequence are Imagineer, Realiser and Editor, rather than Dreamer, Realist and Critic (or “Spoiler”). Similar, I know, but definitely different. And the subtle differences between the words make a big difference when it
How new words are born
about 1 year ago - 1 comment
New words are being created at an astonishing rate at the moment – or so it seems from here. In the last week, I’ve spotted three interesting ones in my inbox: Andrew Cain introduced Fixititis. He says it happens when patients expect the doctor to fix everything for them – and the caring doctor feels










about 6 months ago
I think it is always best to be able to use both faculties of the brain, and be able to gain maximum benefit of them both. When I did my training for the commercial pilots licence, most of my fellow pilots were left brain guys, all about figures, and checklists, and vectors, and graphs. I was embarassed to admit that I was more interested in the way the clouds looked, or the feelings of dropping into a spin and the shudder of the airframe through my fingertips! I was a “danced the skies on laughter silvered wings” guy!
I spent a while in Bournemouth holed up in a guesthouse cramming for the 14 ground exams, and that guesthouse was used mostly by retired people learning to improve their painting technique, and every week, there would be a visiting professional artist to talk to them on technique. I remember being in one lounge with my head in technical manuals, listening to the artists talk about colour, and shade and light and shape, and in my heart of hearts, I wanted to be with them! It was a sledgehammer moment. I had been ruled by my left brain, and and tried to dismiss and push away the right, until I heard it call! From that day I have sought to try and enjoy both hemispheres, and would really miss either of them!
about 6 months ago
I’m afraid Iain is losing it.
I was already very sceptical about his vision on history, but now he begins to rubbish…
about 6 months ago
I fear it’s me talking rubbish, not McGilchrist! Of course we need both sides of the brain, and I’ve fallen into my own trap and created a false dichotomy.
My thinking on all of this was well tweaked at the University of Surrey’s Inner Worlds event earlier in the week. Blog post soon!